Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research - Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), Diagnosis, Gradual and Sudden Onset

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, including details on myalgic encephalomyelitis (me), diagnosis, gradual and sudden onset.


Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Books on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



An experimental study of the influence of individual participant characteristics on formal consensus development.

Carpenter J, Hutchings A, Raine R, Sanderson C

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of participants' characteristics on the results produced by formal consensus methods.Methods: The approach was an experimental study of 346 participants in 20 groups rating the appropriateness of four mental health interventions for the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic back pain. There were four factors in the design: systematic literature review provided or not, decisions made under realistic or "ideal" resource assumptions, clinically mixed (general practitioners and mental health professionals) or homogenous group (general practitioners only), convened or mail-only group. A group's rating was defined as the median of participants' ratings. The influence of participants' characteristics (age, sex, and specialty) was examined using multilevel models.Results: The largest differences were between the GPs and mental health professionals, both in their initial ratings of the different interventions, and in how much they altered their ratings between rounds. There were smaller but statistically significant (p<.05) differences between specialty and age groups in initial ratings for the treatment (by whatever means) of different conditions, and for certain conditions women increased their ratings more than men. Women rated intervention more favorably when assuming "ideal" rather than realistic levels of resources, but men did not.Conclusions: Our findings support the practice of treating professional specialty as an important determinant of the results in consensus panels.

Published 19 January 2007 in Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 23(1): 108-15.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Books

Pediatric Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Pediatric Chronic Fatigue Syndrome